ChrisAn's Blog Please read my disclaimer.

simplegeek

a.k.a. Chris Anderson

Response in some XUL newsgroups

Obviously not everyone likes what we are doing with XAML... Gerald Bauer says "Evidently working together with others to build a rich internet for everyone wasn't on the agenda."

And he also posted a mini-play:

"Act I: Ellen and Ian discuss Microsoft's Longhorn
Markup Language (XAML):

Ellen:  look at that xaml page. it's just ridiculous
Ian: you mean how much it's like XUL?
Ellen: yeah
        except that they use C# instead of js
        so if you want interactivity, it has to be
compiled
Ian: right.
jeez. wow.
could that be a bigger rip-off?
Ellen: it's stunning
"

Obviously I need to look at XUL more - frankly I never have seen the XUL syntax or used it. I found the spec for XUL 1.0 over at Mozilla and saw some of the markup there...

How do I create a new custom binary behavior using XUL? I understand that in IE I am able to implement IElementBehavior and then I can create a new custom element, but I'm wondering how this works in XUL?

XAML is a simple langauge that binds to CLR objects - there is no set of "intrinsic" objects in XAML, everything is based on CLR metadata for types.

Anyway, obviously everyone will have their different views, should be a fun couple years while we all try to make progress on this stuff...

11/01/2003 11:12 PM | #Longhorn

Content © 2003 Chris Anderson | Subscribe to my RSS feed.

Powered by BlogX